 |
Home
HIV/AIDS
Hepatitis
Safe
Sex
Drug
Use & HIV
Contact
Us
Make
a Donation
|
|

Canadian Law as it Pertains to HIV/AIDS
in the Workplace
Based on the many questions we've been asked,
there are a lot of misconceptions about what is means to work
or study with someone who is HIV positive. This page provides
some basic information about what current Canadian law says
about HIV. If you would like more information about how these
apply to your specific environment, we would be happy to discuss
it with you.
Confidentiality and Disclosure:
- A person living with HIV or AIDS may choose
whether or not to disclose their status. They are not
required by law to disclose.
- An employer or service provider cannot inquire
about someone’s HIV status.
- People living with AIDS or HIV have the right
to confidentiality about their status. This means that even
if someone discloses their status to you, you cannot repeat
that information to anyone else without the express consent
of the original person.
- Cases have occurred where companies had to
pay restitution to employees when their confidentiality was
breached.
Accommodation:
- The Canadian Human Rights Act protects those
with disabilities from discrimination. Under the act, both
HIV and AIDS are considered disabilities.
- Individuals with disabilities are entitled
to reasonable accommodation in the workplace when necessary.
This might be something as simple as allowing them to eat
lunch according to their medication schedule or not holding
meetings at a certain hour because of diarrhoea (a side effects
of the medication)
.
- Unfortunately, in order to gain accommodation, someone living
with HIV must disclose their status to at least one person.
This does not mean they loose their right
to confidentiality.
Discrimination:
- The Canadian Human Rights Commission
does not support the testing of employees for HIV because
this has the potential to lead to discrimination.
- A person living with HIV or AIDS cannot be
excluded from a job or service unless it can be proven that
they do not meet a bona fide occupational requirement or there
is a bona fide justification for excluding them.
- "Potential transmission risk" is
not considered a bona fide justification. In fact, there are
surgeons, nurses, and dentists living with HIV. As long as
universal precautions are observed, there is not a risk of
transmission.
- Customer or employee preferences, anxiety,
or misunderstanding are never acceptable bona fide justifications.
|
 |